Prophet Muhammad's Death Erection

Priapism

Priapism is a potentially painful medical condition, in which the erect penis or clitoris[1] does not return to its flaccid state, despite the absence of both physical and psychological stimulation, within four hours. The name comes from the Greek god Priapus, a fertility god often represented with a disproportionately large and permanent erection.[2][3]

Priapism is considered a medical emergency, which should receive proper treatment by a qualified medical practitioner. The duration of a normal erection before it is classifiable as priapism is still controversial. Some sources say an ongoing penile erection for more than 6 hours, rather than 4 hours, can be classified as priapism.[4]
Priapisms in Paradise

According to Islamic scripture, all Muslim males that are admitted to Paradise will technically suffer from priapisms. A hasan hadith[5] from Ibn Majah (one of the six canonical hadith collections) concerning the 72 virgins provides this detail on the physical attributes given to men by Allah to sustain them (Muslim males "will have an ever-erect penis").[6] Al-Suyuti (one of the latter-day authorities of the Shafi'i School of fiqh) also wrote that the "penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal".[7]
Death Erection

A death erection, angel lust, or terminal erection is a post-mortem erection, technically a priapism. It has been observed in the corpses of human males[8] and also in the animal kingdom. Possibly the most famous occurrence being in the Berezovka Mammoth,[9] discovered in 1900.

While it is usually observed in victims of hangings, it can also be found in victims of violent deaths by poisoning, fatal gunshot wounds to the brain, or a stroke or other brain embolisms. And it can also be caused by decomposition.[10] In some rare cases, ejaculation of semen may also occur.[11]
Muhammad’s Death Erection

Abu al-Fida (1273 – 1331 AD) was a Muslim geographer and historian. He relates that Prophet Muhammad suffered from a death erection. Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib, the fourth Rightly-guided Caliph of Islam (and also Muhammad's son-in-law and cousin) washed his body after his death, and had exclaimed, "O prophet, thy penis is erect unto the sky!"[12]

The mainstream Muslim understanding and the Islamic sources concerning Muhammad's death say he died of poisoning by a Jewish women. However the effects of the poison were only gradual. The hadith surrounding his death are consistent with the possibility he suffered a brain embolism leading to his post-mortem erection.

What's Wrong with Islam?

by Mahathir

Since the period of expansionism which began with the Islamic regime's conquest of a large portion of the world under Prophet Muhammad during the period in Medina, Islam has been characterized by a) racism and hate mongering, b) crimes against humanity, and c) violence.

a) The Quran openly describes Jews, referred to in the Quran as people of the book, as apes and swine as indicative in Surah 5 Verse 59: 'O people of the Book! Do ye disapprove of us for no other reason than that we believe in Allah...' and verse 60 (which continues): '[s]hall I point [out] to you something much worse than this, (as judged by the treatment it received from Allah?) those who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath, those of whom He transformed into apes and swine....' (English translation by Abdullah Yusuf Ali, an Indian Islamic scholar whose translation of the Quran is the most widely known and used in the English-speaking world). Furthermore, in Hadith as transcribed by Sahih Muslim (41:6985), they are told that: ‘Abu Huraira reported that Allah’s messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: “The last hour would not come unless the Muslim will fight against the Jew and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and the stone would say: Muslim, the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him….”’ And again in the Hadith Sahih Muslim (41:6981): ‘Ibn’ Umar reported Allah’s messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even the stone would say: Muslim, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him,’ and in the Hadith as transcribed by Bukhari (V4B55N657) which admonishes Muslims to: ‘…break the cross and kill the swine (Jews), and again in Surah 5 Verse 33 and Verse 32, in which he conveys a clear message that ‘mischief makers,’ i.e. the infidels (Jews, Christians, Pagans and all non-Muslims are to be killed as encapsulated in Surah 5 Verse 33; ‘The punishment for those who wage war against Allah and his Prophet and perpetrate mischief (reject Islam or oppose its goals] in the land, is to murder them, to hang them, to mutilate them, or banish them….’  This not only encourages Muslims to slaughter the Jewish people but also constitutes racism of the highest order in the form of anti-Semitisms and also encourages discrimination against Jews perpetuated by the media of the Middle East which actively socializes Muslim children into practicing hate mongering.

Chants of "Death to America" and "Death to Great Satan" can openly be witnessed in the Middle East with thousands of Muslims demonstrating in the streets. Not only is this true but Muslims of Middle Eastern descent can openly be seen calling for the annihilation of Jews, Israel, America and the West. This culture of hate mongering is deeply rooted in the Islamic tradition which advocates that Muslims emulate Prophet Muhammad as prescribed by the Hadith; for the Prophet slaughtered 900 Jews in Medina following the colonialism that began with Islam's ugly conquest of a large portion of the world.

Not only is this true, but discrimination by Muslims against non-Muslims extend further than anti-Semitisms. Muslims discriminate against all non-Muslims regardless of religious affiliation because the Quran calls for non-Muslims to accept second class status in society as preached by the Quran; Surah 9 Verse 29: '[f]ight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day.... ...nor acknowledge the religion of Truth.... ...until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued' (Yusuf Ali). This verse from the Quran openly calls for Muslims to discriminate against all non-Muslims regardless of religious affiliation until non-Muslims accept the status of Dhimmis in society, regard Muslims as superiors under an Islamic caliphate where they submit themselves to Muslims in a state of subjugation, not only acknowledging the superiority of Muslims, but also paying the Jizya (a tax for non-Muslims) as dictated by the Quran – which by tradition under the Islamic caliphate in Medina under Prophet Muhammad, necessitates that non-Muslims extend the Jizya to Muslims on bended knees and for Muslims to spit at non-Muslims.

This culture of discrimination prevailed during the Muslim conquests under Prophet Muhammad with wide scale hate crimes being committed against places of religious worship in countries that fell under the control of the Prophet with his megalomania conquests – which saw an inordinate number of Buddhists and Hindu temples in countries such as India being destroyed. Unfortunately, this culture still prevails today with hate crimes being committed by Muslims who burn down churches in Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, South African countries, as well as acts of terrorism perpetrated by Muslims against the French, German, British and American people. Not only is this true, but the culture of discrimination against non-Muslims can also be witnessed in the banning of churches in the Middle East as well as restrictions to the size of places of religious worship being placed upon non-Muslims in Malaysia, the banning of the Bible in hotels in the same, the forbidding of the translation of the Bible into Bahasa Malaysia and the use of the term Allah in Bible which have been translated into Bahasa Malaysia.

Other hate crimes against non-Muslims are documented in historical accounts of racial riots in Indonesia, committed by Muslims against ethnic Chinese due to envy over the wealth of the Chinese, and in Malaysia which saw ethnic minorities being slaughtered during May 13th. for the same reason.

But the racism does not end there as can be witnessed by conflicts between Muslims and Christians throughout the world, as well as racist policies of discrimination against ethnic minorities being implemented, in countries such as Malaysia, that discriminates against so-called non-bumiputras in the field of education, employment and business. This is not to say that all Muslims subscribe to prejudice and discrimination; there are ample Muslims who don't strictly abide by the Quran; it is merely to say that the Quran dictates that Muslims discriminate against non-Muslims and that if a purist interpretation of the religion (that is to say, the interpretation of the Quran during the days when the Prophet Muhammad was alive and propagated his religion throughout the world, and which existed in the Muslim world following the death of the Prophet for centuries, as well as the brand of Sunni Islam as practiced by Saudi Arabia, called Salafism and Wahhabism) were to be practiced that rampant discrimination would be prevalent in Muslim countries.

b) Crimes against humanity can easily be witnessed by acts of terrorism committed by Muslims in the name of Islam (more on that in point c) and gross violations of human rights as indicative by the acts of dictators in Libya such as Muhammad Gadhafi – who is slaughtering rebel fighters in the South African nation; in Syria through Bashar al-Assad's slaughter of anti-government demonstrators; as well as the mass murder of religious dissidents under the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

The violation of human rights does not end with the acts of dictators but also extend to other areas such as honor killings, that are committed by Muslims towards their relatives, for perceived despoiling of the family's honor, the cruel and unusual punishment as prescribed by Syariah Law, and the oppression of women in Muslim countries.

As for the former, precedent is set by the tradition of Muslims advocating the beheading of Muslims for something as minor as apostasy as prescribed by the Quran; while the cruel and unusual punishment as prescribed by Syariah Law can be found in verses in the Quran that call for the stoning of homosexuals and critics of the Prophet, and the call for whipping of drug addicts as well as the cutting off of the hands of thieves; while the latter is prescribed in the Quran – which abundantly makes the superiority of men over women known by saying that a woman's place is to obey and satisfy her husband's every desire and the injunction that men reserve the right to beat their wives for any disobedience, as transcribed by Tabari 113: ‘Allah permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them (with most Muslim scholars now engaging in a theological discussion as to what constitute the appropriate type of beating), and again in Surah 4 Verse 34: ‘Men are the maintainers of women…. ….the good women are therefore obedient…. …and (as to) those whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in their sleeping places and beat them….’ further exacerbated by the injunction in Ishaq: 512: ‘The Apostle prohibited four things the morning of the Khasybar raid (during which time the Muslims captured the women of the lands they conquer and kept them as sex slaves): carnal intercourse with pregnant women who were captured, mingling his seed with another man’s (no gang rape); nor is it lawful for him to take (rape) her until she is in a state of cleanliness (not menstruating) and the statement by Allah that ‘…I must also make Eve stupid…. …all of the women menstruate and are stupid.’  the implication that a man's testimony is equal to that of four women's and the discrimination being preached against women by imams in mosques throughout the United Kingdom (see Channel 4's brilliant documentary Undercover Mosque and Undercover Mosque – The Return), and can be witnessed through genital mutilation of Muslim women throughout Muslim countries.

c) As for acts of terrorism, Muslims are exhorted by the Quran to fight in the name of Allah, given the fact that there are literally thousands of verses in the Quran and sayings in the Hadith that instigates Muslim to commit acts of terrorism and to fight against the kuffars (non-Muslims) and bring about an Islamic Caliphate, where the whole world will be brought under Muslim rule  and to subscribe by the injunction that it is their religious obligation to carry out Jihad for the Sake of Allah and their religion, as transcribed in Surah 33 Verse 27, where Muslims are led to believe that the whole world is for their taking, upon the claim that: ‘…he made you heirs to their lands and their dwelling and their property….’ And where Muslims are admonished to slay the Pagans wherever they find them as transcribed in Surah 9 Verse 5: '...fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)....' (Yusuf Ali), which is reiterated in Surah 8 Verse 59: ‘The infidels should not think they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them. They are your enemies and Allah’s enemies,’ and again in Surah 4 Verse 101: ‘the unbelievers are your invertebrate foe,’ which is regurgitated in Surah 9 Verse 13, which admonishes the Muslim to: ‘murder them and treat them harshly,’ which is again reiterated in Surah 8 Verse 12 and Surah 8 Verse 60 which reads: ‘Instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers’ and ‘smite above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them,’ and in Surah 8 Verse 12: ‘Your Lord inspired the Angels with the message: ‘I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes,’ and again in Surah 2 Verse 191: ‘…kill the disbelievers wherever we find them,’ and again in Surah 8 Verse 7: ‘Allah wish to confirm the truth by His words: ”Wipe the infidels out to the last”’ and again in Surah 8 Verse 60: ‘Prepare against them whatever arms and cavalry you can muster that you may strike terror in the enemies of Allah,’ and again in Surah 47 Verse 4, ‘Strike off the heads of the disbelievers.... [and after making a] ‘…wide slaughter among them, tie up the remaining captives,’ and again in the Hadith as transcribed by Bukhari (V9B84N59; ‘”Allah’s apostle said: I have been order to fight the people till they say: “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’  Muslims are taught to divided the world in half: The House of Islam, where Muslims and non-Muslims who subjugate themselves in acknowledgement of Muslim superiority and willingly pay the Jizya live in peace and harmony, and the House of War, where war is declared against non-Muslims who refuse to submit themselves and pay the Jizya (Islam, is an Arabic word meaning submission, regardless of what Muslims apologists would say when they try to convince non-Muslims into believing that it means peace; playing on the subtly of the Arabic language where there is another similar sounding word that actually does mean peace). To acerbate the situation, Surah 61 Verse 4 claims that: 'Allah loves those who fight in His cause in battle array,' (Yusuf Ali) while Surah 2 Verse 190 admonishes Muslims to: '[f]ight those who fight you....' (Yusuf Ali). Surah 2 Verse 191 continues with: '[a]nd kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out of the places [from] whence they drove you out, [for] persecution is worse than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them.' (Shakir). Surah 2 Verse 193 continues: '[a]nd fight them [...] until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except for those who practice oppression.' (Yusuf Ali) These verses are frequently cited by terrorists as justification for acts of terrorisms throughout the world. Osama bin Laden in his infamous letters to America (of which there are many), first calls for Americans to embrace Islam, failing which he threatens America with acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. To make matters worse, Muslims children in the Middle East are taught to love Jihad and to aspire for Martyrdom through the process of socialization through their families, educational institutions and the media. Hence, it comes as no surprise to witness Muslims committing acts of terrorism against those whom they believe have been guilty of inflicting perceived injustice against them, such as Israel when it rightfully attempts to safeguard the country from descending into chaos by taking action to curtail acts of terrorism committed by Palestinians in Gaza either through suicide bombings or the use of improvised explosive devices, when it tries to restore law and order to prevent the country from descending into political instability by taking action against acts of anarchy committed by Palestinians throwing rocks at innocent passersbys and smashing car windows, and when they rightfully retaliate against rocket attacks by Hamas or the PLO that inflict casualties on innocent civilians in areas that may or may not be heavily populated; for even the Bible justifies retaliation in self-defense (an eye for an eye, a hand for a hand, when thy hand offend thee cut it off, when thy eye offend thee pluck it out). It bears reminding that even in Muslims countries, stern action is taken against those who engage in activities that threaten political stability; for example, in Malaysia, anyone who takes to the street in demonstrations or attempts to commit acts of terrorism will be taken into custody under the Police Act and ISA and thrown into jail. (By the way, Israel has rightfully taken action to block so-called activists from sending flotillas into the nation, for one can never know for sure that these activists are not trying to smuggle arms provided by interested parties to Hamas).

For Muslims, there is no guarantee of salvation unless they die in the cause of Jihad. In the Hadith, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 555 (narrated by Aby Huraira), it can be found that: 'Allah's Apostle said, "Allah guarantees (the person who carries out Jihad in his cause....) that He will either admit him into Paradise (Martyrdom) or return him with reward or booty...."' while Surah 9 Verse 111 continues with: '...Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain. It is a promise which is binding on Him.... ...[w]ho fullfileth His covenant better than Allah? Rejoice in the bargain that ye have made, for that is the supreme triumph.' (English translation by Picktall, a British Muslim scholar widely known for his translation of the Quran), which is reiterated in Surah 61 Verse 11: ‘Have faith in God and His Messenger and the struggle (jihad) for His cause with your possessions and his persons – that is better for you,’ which resumes in Verse 12: ‘…and he will forgive you your sins, admit you into the Gardens graced with flowing streams [of wine], into pleasant dwellings in the Gardens of Eternity. That is the Supreme triumph,’ while Surah 3 Verse 169 proclaims that: '...those who are slain in Allah's way [are not] dead. Nay, they live, finding their sustenance in the presence of the Lord,' (Yusuf Ali) while Verse 170 that 'they rejoice in the bounty provided by Allah: '[a]nd [with] regard to those left behind, who have not joined them (in their bliss), the (Martyrs) glory in the fact that on them [there] is no fear, nor have they (cause to) grieve.' (Yusuf Ali) Hence, the Quran not only guarantees Jihadists a place in Paradise (Heaven) but also proclaims that their families will not grieve, for the Martyr will be ensured a place in Paradise with 72 mansions with 72 homes with 72 sheets on 72 beds with 72 virgins who will never lose their virginity, as encapsulated in Surah 44 Verse 51 – 56, Surah 52 Verse 17 – 29 and Surah 55 Verse 46 – 78, while Surah 37 Verse 48 proclaims that:'...besides them will be chaste women, restraining their glances, with big eyes (of beauty and wonder).' (Yusuf Ali) Hence, it comes as no surprise that interviews with families of suicide bombers do not find their mothers grieving, feeling sad or ashamed over the death of their child, but rather rejoicing over the notion that their child is now in Paradise (Heaven) enjoying eternal intercourse with 72 virgins because the Martyr's erection will not wither (a condition known medically by the term priapism) but last for eternity. Islam has assured jihadists not only a place in Paradise (Heaven) but also promised them sexual delights beyond anything they will ever experience on earth – a strong incentive for sexually frustrated young Muslim men to take up the cause of jihad.

In conclusion, let me leave you with the ominous words of Prophet Muhammad. '...I would love to be martyred in Allah's Cause and then get resurrected and then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred again and then get resurrected again and then get martyred.' (Hadith, collected by Muhammad al-Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari)

Does this mean that all Muslims are bad and will commit acts of terrorism if they have the chance? Of course not. There is a substantial number of peace loving Muslims who neither care for pursuing a course of Jihad or committing acts of terrorism. It does mean, however, that there will be an increase in terrorist activities if more Muslims were to subscribe to a purist interpretation of the Quran.

Islamic Group Pushes to Curb Free Speech after Charlie Hebdo Attack

Act for America

To

me

Jan 14 at 11:56 PM

LARGEST ISLAMIC BODY IN THE WORLD CALLS FOR MORE ANTI-FREE SPEECH LAWS IN WAKE OF CHARLIE HEBDO ATTACK We were all horrified to hear about last week’s violent attack on the French publication, Charlie Hebdo. Americans value, perhaps more than any other right, their freedom of speech. The Free Speech Defense Act is legislation that has been introduced in states across the nation that protects American authors, journalists and artists from being dragged into foreign courts over frivolous libel charges in jurisdictions that do not respect, value and protect freedom of speech and of the press. ACT for America has worked to pass Free Speech Defense Act legislation in 10 states, and our members are working to see that this important law is passed from coast to coast. Will you help us? For more information on what you can do in your community, contact us at info@actforamerica.org and place “FREE SPEECH DEFENSE ACT” in the subject line. Largest Islamic Body in the World Calls for More Anti-Free Speech Laws in Wake of Charlie Hebdo Attack By Patrick Poole Last week’s terror attack targeting French magazine Charlie Hebdo's office in Paris has sparked a global conversation about the nature of free speech, with the “Je Suis Charlie” hashtag in support of the murdered Charlie Hebdo staff going viral and becoming the most used hashtag in the history of Twitter. But this afternoon, the UN representative for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Ufuk Gokcen, was expressing another view with respect to free speech. The OIC is comprised of the 57 Muslim-majority nations and the Palestinian Authority. They are the largest bloc at the UN, and when they meet on the head-of-state level, they literally speak for the Muslim world. So it is noteworthy that after the Charlie Hebdo attack, Gokcen is now calling for more implementation of the OIC-sponsored UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18 and the follow-up Rabat Plan of Action that would criminalize the very type of speech that Charlie Hebdo engaged in: The timing of Gokcen’s call couldn’t be more perfect. Today, University of Tennessee law professor Robert Blitt (a colleague of our own Instapundit, Glenn Reynolds) had an oped published in USA Today calling out the OIC for its retrograde views on free speech and how they fuel Islamic extremism: The OIC, whose member states range from moderate U.S. allies such as Jordan to adversaries such as Iran, describes itself as the world’s largest international body after the United Nations. For more than a decade, “the collective voice of the Muslim world” has spread the belief that any insult directed against the Muslim faith or its prophet demands absolute suppression. Quashing “defamation of Islam” is enshrined as a chief objective in the organization’s charter. With countless internal resolutions, relentless lobbying of the international community and block voting on resolutions advocating a prohibition on defamation of religion at the U.N., the OIC continuously pushes to silence criticism of Islam. Translated into practice inside Islamic nations and increasingly elsewhere, this toxic vision breeds contempt for freedom of religion and expression, justifies the killing of Muslims and non-Muslims alike, and casts a pall of self-censorship over academia and the arts. By building the expectation that dissent or insult merits suppression, groups such as the OIC and the Arab League have emboldened extremists to take protection of Islam to the next level. With the most authoritative Muslim voices prepared to denounce violence but not to combat the idea that Islam should be immune from criticism, a meaningful response to counteract the resulting violence continues to be glaringly absent. An OIC statement released after a 2011 Charlie Hebdo issue “guest-edited” by the prophet Mohammed typifies this troubling position: “Publication of the insulting cartoon … was an outrageous act of incitement and hatred and abuse of freedom of expression. … The publishers and editors of the Charlie Hebdo magazine must assume full responsibility for their … incitement of religious intolerance.” As Professor Blitt notes in his oped, the OIC has been the international driving force behind the passage of Resolution 16/18, which was co-sponsored by Pakistan and the United States and passed in December 2011. When passed, Resolution 16/18 was billed by the Obama administration as an improvement over previous “defamation of religion” resolutions. But the effort immediately came under fire from religious liberties and free speech experts: In the view of veteran international religious liberty analyst and advocate Elizabeth Kendal resolution 16/18, “far from being a breakthrough for free speech … is actually more dangerous than” the religious defamation resolutions. “Indeed, the strategic shift from defamation to incitement actually advances the OIC’s primary goal: the criminalization of criticism of Islam,” she wrote. The OIC’s push to criminalize “defamation of Islam” goes back to the OIC’s 10 Year Plan of Action adopted in 2005. Under the section “Countering Islamophobia” (VII), the plan says: 3. Endeavor to have the United Nations adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia, and call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments. In their published implementation plan for their 10 Year Plan of Action, they are more clear that combating “defamation of religion” is not what they were after, but rather criminalizing “Islamophobia”: Which is effectively what they’ve accomplished with the generous assistance of the Obama administration. Just two months before the passage of Resolution 16/18, senior Justice Department officials were meeting with U.S. Islamic groups discussing that very thing. In fact, in my annual “National Security 'Not Top 10' of 2011? (no. 7) here at PJ Media, I noted the active cooperation of Hillary Clinton and the State Department in working with the OIC as part of their “Istanbul Process” to that end. And in November 2012, when I reported here that U.S. Embassy in Jeddah Consul General Anne Casper was going to be addressing the OIC’s symposium on “defamation of Islam,” the OIC quickly scrubbed any reference to her appearance. My colleague Stephen Coughlin has posted a video lecture outlining how the OIC’s efforts with respect to Resolution 16/18 are really rooted in Islamic law’s codes prohibiting blasphemy: It’s hardly surprising that even after the Charlie Hebdo attack the OIC is not content to abandon their decade-long effort to criminalize “Islamophobia.” But, much as Professor Blitt has warned in his oped today, by doing so they are pushing the global Islamic community further away from the rest of the world.